Close Encounter

My telepathic close encounter left me with an explanation of how gravity, atoms and galaxies are interrelated, and how we can use this knowledge to obtain clean power, new materials and transportation, and better health. But is it right? You be the judge.

In 1983 I had an experience that I can only explain as a close encounter. I had just put on some music and was starting to relax on the couch with eyes closed when I realized that it was not the backs of my eyelids that I was viewing, but a gently concave off-white wall and two beings that were very bright. These individuals were putting thoughts directly into my head; they were telling me not to be afraid, that I was to be asked a number of questions and that it was totally voluntary. I could withdraw at any time simply by opening my eyes.

At this point I opened my eyes and found myself still on the couch with the record playing. Upon closing my eyes again the experience resumed. I was to be interrogated by another individual and would then be allowed to ask questions of my own. I was fascinated by what was happening and quickly gave my consent. They brought me into the presence of an important-looking person, and I say person because he looked human, with longish blond hair and a complexion darker but more gold- color than brown . He gave me the understanding that he was assigned to the forces of this part of the Galaxy. He was seated behind some sort of large desk or consol.

The two beings who had brought me in withdrew and I was subsequently asked a great number of questions by this individual. Each question was put directly into my mind as an already-created "structure". My mind would examine it, and as soon as it was understood connections would be made to all the information I had on the subject. At the precise instant my mind viewed these memories so too did my questioner. There was no possibility of blocking or withholding anything. I would then immediately be presented with another question. There were many, many of these, and many were very personal. I don`t remember any of them because there were so many and they came so fast. Each question and answer took perhaps a second- as fast as thought!

At some point during the early part of this questioning I again opened my eyes to find myself on the couch (seated) and the record still not half-finished. When I again closed them and found myself once more in front of him, he was just turning back to me, and I got the impression that this was a very busy man who had not been merely waiting for me to return, but taking care of some other business in my absence. Once he had finished his questions I was invited to ask anything I liked. However, all my questions had to be asked at once, with all the answers following in the same order.

I have always had an interest in Science, and quite a few such questions came very rapidly, as if more from my subconcious than my concious mind. I recall some of them. How does the atom work? How does gravity work? How does light work? When the answers came, I feared my questions were too ambitious. I could follow the explanation for a short while until I became lost and then could only watch the flow of ideas and hope they were being retained at another level.

Over the years following this experience much of this material on gravity, light and atoms has come back to me. As usual, it looks as though we have some major things wrong in our theories. Our position on the atom reminds me of the flat-Earth theory of pre-Columbus days. And, not knowing how atoms work, we naturally have gravity wrong; we have it exactly backwards. Let me put forward a brief explanation of Gravity, which must also tell a little about the atom.

Each galaxy projects an electromagnetic wave in the form of an outwardly-moving spiral, which has at the same time components both of rotation and of revolution. Our Sun has exactly the same kind of magnetic wave associated with it, and its solar wind pushes on ions. The galaxy's spiralling wave is enormously, awesomely bigger than the Sun's, and it pushes on all atoms. Each atom, being identical in every respect except magnitude to a galaxy, has the same magnetic spiral associated with it, and can resonate with the field of any galaxy it happens to be aligned with. It thus draws energy from the field and receives a push in the direction the field is moving. There are galaxies in all directions, so these fields are incoming from all directions. A body of matter having its constituent atoms in random magnetic alignment will experience pushes coming equally from all directions, and will sense itself to be weightless. However, when the body is next to another, much larger body, i.e. on the surface of a planet, the push from the planet's direction has been to some extent absorbed by the planet's interior, and the body will feel a lack of push, or in other words it will be 'pulled' toward the planet.

As a planet increases in size so, too, will the gravity experienced by a body on its surface, but only until ALL the push coming from that direction has been absorbed. At that point the planet may grow larger, but its surface gravity will remain the same. The gravity possible in any one area of space has a limit dictated by the density of these galaxy-produced magnetic waves, i.e. by the density of the galaxies.

What evidence do we have to support the existence of these huge, galaxy-produced magnetic fields? The following is an article from 'Time', August 6, 1984:

A Spectacular Magnetic Field May Be Sculpting The Milky Way

Astronomers have identified fiery quasars, pulsars and the wispy shadows of supernova explosions at the very edges of the known universe. Yet the core of our own galaxy, the Milky Way, has long been an elusive stranger. Thick clouds of interstellar dust and gas absorb most of the light from the galaxy's central bulge long before it reaches planet earth, a small and distant suburb 30,000 light-years away from the Milky Way's midsection.

Three radio astronomers have now probed behind that celestial curtain and found a spectacular feature that has never before been closely observed: a band of gas 10 to 20 light- years thick, seemingly composed of lacy filaments, stretching up to 600 light-years above the plane of the Milky Way. The belt is the first hint that an enormous magnetic field may be far more important in shaping the core of the galaxy than had previously been imagined. Scientists have yet to gauge the full impact of the finding, but it could undermine existing theories about star formation at the galactic center and possibly illuminate how the Milky Way evolves.

Indeed, the appearance of the magnetic arc was so unlike anything ever before observed in the universe that for weeks its three discoverers refused to accept their own finding. "We were very frustrated," says Farhad Yusef-Zadeh, a graduate student at Columbia University and one of the trio. "The first thing we thought was to try to get rid of the structure, to fudge the data. But it wouldn't go away."

Astronomers have long been trying to study the center of the galaxy, using the feeble and sporadic X-rays, gamma rays and other invisible electromagnetic energy that manages to seep through the celestial dust in the Milky Way. But the resulting computer- derived pictures have been too small and too blurry to provide details.

All that began to change in 1980 when the National Radio Astronomy Observatory inaugurated the Very Large Array (VLA), an extraordinary $78.3 million string of 27 radio telescopes set out like giant Dixie cups across 21 miles of the desert of New Mexico. The VLA is one of a kind: the separate signals received by the 27 instruments can be melded into a single seamless picture, providing scientists with huge, highly detailed portraits of the heavens. Pointing the VLA toward the galactic center, Yusef-Zadeh and his Columbia colleague, Don Chance, along with astronomer Mark Morris of UCLA, mapped out 200 light years of the galaxy.

At first glance the arc looked ordinary, like colliding clouds of galactic dust or a swatch of newborn, fuzzy stars. Calculations soon ruled out both possibilities. The astronomers then wondered if the threadlike arc might be the tattered remnant of interstellar material that had been sucked into a black hole at the galaxy's center; that notion too was discarded. Explains Frank Kerr, provost of sciences at the University of Maryland, who has studied the structure of the Milky Way since 1951: "You'd expect a black hole to be pulling in all directions, not in an isolated arc." Kerr and others are now leaning toward the presence of a powerful and mysterious magnetic field as the most plausible cause.

The magnetic field, if it exists, defies scientists' notions about proper celestial behavior. Perhaps even more baffling to astronomers, the belt of gas rises up at a right angle to the plane of the Milky Way, an extraordinary position for a magnetic field; normally it should lie in the galactic plane, its lines of force trapped like hair around a drain. Attempting to account for the bizarre properties of the field, some scientists are postulating the existence of a "dynamo" at the center of the galaxy, a source of relentless energy. But investigators cannot ascribe the dynamo to any known generating force, like giant stars or a black hole; those phenomena are too small to account for the size of the magnetic field.

So far the strange arc has raised only questions, not answers. Once gravity was thought to be the sole force shaping the large scale of the galaxy. Now it has lost some more of its supremacy to whatever molded the giant ribbon of gas. Listening to the radio waves crackling noisily from the center of the galaxy, astronomers were sure that the bulge of dust was a maternity ward for new stars. Now the strange arc has revealed itself as one mighty source of those waves, raising the startling possibility that the middle of the Milky Way is a barren womb. Seeking to solve the mysteries, astronomers will return to the Very Large Array again and again, tracking the motion of the gas within the filaments and possibly the origin of the dynamo at the core of the galaxy, where the answer to many questions may be revealed.

by Natalie Angler

So what are we looking at when we see a magnetic arc rising at right-angles to the center of the galaxy disc? Each atom being identical in every respect to a galaxy (including being itself made up of atoms like itself and in turn influencing their magnetic environment), the arms of stars turning around a common center act like electrons moving in a circle: they generate a magnetic pole just like an electromagnet. Why is it an arc? A galaxy is a flat disc. So is an atom if we could stop time and look at them in the same way that we look at galaxies in their incredibly huge time- and size-frame. But atoms are a spherical expression of energy and that disc is very rapidly revolving, compared to our time frame, just as the galaxy's disc is revolving so slowly for us that we don't even know it yet. It is this revolution of the galaxy disc that throws the magnetic pole into an arc. There is another arc rising from the other side of the Milky Way, and just like the magnetic arcs coming from the Sun come from opposite sides and arc in opposite directions in order to curl around each other and form an ever-outwardly-moving spiral, so too do those arising from each galaxy's center.

This is a pattern I came upon when I plotted the path taken by an electron on a spinning disc when that disc is also revolving at exactly twice the rate of its spin. Every two revolutions the electron repeats the same orbital.

Galaxy Pattern

Eight orbitals complete this pattern, which I have named the Galaxy Pattern, as I know of no previous name. A ring of 16 members forms this pattern when it is rotating once every time it revolves twice. Opposite members are always at opposite ends of the same pathway and have the exact opposite rotation/revolution spin: +one half and -one half. Two is the maximum number of members per pathway.

And rings of 16 can be linked to the Periodic Table of the Elements. The Periodic Table can be constructed shell by shell and matched to the growth of concentric rings of 16 members. Inward growth of the rings coincides with the last two elements of the 8b group and the Lanthanides and the Actinides, and is colored red. This splits the elements into two types; those that change valence over the preceding element (blue), and those that do not (red).

Periodic Table as Concentric Rings of 16

Apparently, if we can learn to copy and use these electromagnetic spirals, we can create a sort of gravity 'umbrella'. We can use these fields to tap the incoming gravitational energy, thus providing free, unlimited power. We can influence materials in their formation to take on a more crystalline nature by letting them solidify at the center of the right spinning field, thus allowing us to create large crystals for the storage of this power. The lighter, stronger materials that may thus be created can be combined with these fields to create vehicles that will be able to selectively 'fall' toward any gravity source while ignoring the nearer, stronger gravity of the planet they are closest to. Multi-benefits!

Is anyone presently trying to copy the Sun's magnetic field as it was revealed to us in 1980? I would love to be in on an endeavor like that. The Galaxy pattern shown above was drawn by hand. Is it possible to dynamically create that on a computer, perhaps orbital by orbital? I know that I can't presently accomplish that, being a computer novice of 2 months. Let me know what you think! Oscillating magnetic fields have lately been fingered as affecting people, plants and animals in various ways. If we can copy the Sun's field I would anticipate it to have a strongly beneficial effect on all kinds of organic and inorganic chemical reactions, possibly affording us a way of healing many conditions that are presently incurable. Let me know what you think!