Galaxy Model: How light and Neutrinos Might be modelled by Spinning
Charge-Pairs
The Photon............................................................................................................................................................
Utilizing this charge-pair let's consider possible
models for
the photon, which might be viewed as an area of negative *charge*
rotating
around an area of positive *charge* with the whole structure moving
at the speed of light. Let's say that when energy combines with the
void it separates a region of "more-than-nothing" from a region of
"less-than-nothing". The more-than-nothing region would represent the
negatively-charged
area and the less-than-nothing region would represent the positive
charge. Now you have the charge-pair. (If this sounds
counter-intuitive, it is; but since we have termed the electron to be
negative, that's how it is. (-: )
There are numerous ways two charges can rotate
around each other, but since observation shows negative to rotate
around positive in the atom, let's consider some of the possible
scenarios.
A positive charge travelling at the speed of light with a negative charge rotating around it in the plane of the direction of travel would seem to do many things a photon does. The electric field would be seen to reverse itself twice every cycle and the movement of the negative charge in a circle would create a magnetic field at right-angles to the electrical field. There are two possibilities for the magnetic field depending on which way the negative charge is rotating around the positive. The shape of the wave is a CURTATE-CYCLOID, which may be crests up or down as opposed to a SINE wave for which there is no difference except phase when viewed upside-down. These photons would therefore be *curtate cycloid* waves, not sine waves, and would be crest up or crest down for any one frequency and polarization, depending on which way the negative charge is rotating! Two photons could be the same frequency, be in the same plane, be in phase, and still be generating magnetic moments pointing in opposite directions.- could this be why one will bounce off the water's surface and the other will be drawn in?
If the photon is structured this way and moving at
the speed of light, with the positive charge following an essentially
straight line and the negative charge rotating around it, the negative
charge must be exceeding lightspeed. How is this possible? Perhaps the
material making up the negative charge is made of much finer stuff than
that making up the positive charge.
It is shown that all waves are circularly-polarized,
and has been shown that the frequency of rotation of the polarization
matches the frequency of the wave. So our wheel-based curtate cycloid
wave is also corkscrewing once around the line of travel each rotation.
Turning the cycloid curtate once per cycle around the axis of travel
(precessing the disc), would result
in a one-to-one
standing wave. At least, that is how it would appear from the
point of view of right beside it.
The other way to move one-to-one linked energy along a line of travel is to have the secondary axis remain perpendicular to the line of travel while rotating at the same frequency. This would represent neutrinos. The picture below views such a rotation from above.
neutrino
All the spokes on the photon wheel
follow the same path. All pass through the axis of travel twice per
cycle. This is not true of the neutrino. The picture above shows the
spoke that starts pointed straight up on the upright wheel (vertical to
the axis of travel) and when the wheel has moved to the horizontal
position, it also has moved 90 degrees to the 3 o'clock position (again
vertical to the axis of travel). This spoke never gets parallel to the
axis of travel. Two other spokes, those that start at the 3 o'clock and
9 o'clock positions, pass through the axis of travel twice every cycle,
just like photons, but these are the *only* positions that do so.
So, yeah, exploring possible models for
reality using standing waves from linked rotations. 1:1 emr, 1:2 matter.